|
Drug Testing in the Workplace
By Ernest D. Lykissa Ph.D.
Anyone that takes the time
to read more than a few lines of this article will encounter
some good and some bad news. The good news is that in
the last 10 years we all have learned a lot about abused
drugs and how they affect the workplace. On the other
hand, testing workers for drugs has become a huge, competitive
business. Regulated urine drug testing is now a reliable
and reasonably well-understood process by the testers.
The bad news is that we have done a poor job in educating
the work force how drugs are detected, how prescribed
medications yield positive results, and furthermore,
how long some of these drugs stay in your system.
Scenario One
For example, if your spouse
gives you a Tylenol pill for a back pain, that their
doctor gave them for their shoulder pain, you may be
in a lot more trouble than you bargained for. This pill
(Tylenol 3) may have contained along with the 300 mg
of Acetaminophen, 3 mg of Codeine which will in
turn make you test positive for opiates on your next
random test at work. Should you not be able to show
them a prescription written out to your name, you could
be fired for abuse of drugs. This scenario seems to
be repeating itself all over the Houston workplace in
the last several years. A lot of attorneys are making
a good living at arguing these issues.
To make it worse, some drug
testing firms make money by keeping tabs on all these
types of occurrences in a database. They sell these
databases to anyone that wants them. If you go
apply down the street to some other business your record
(your spouses Tylenol pill incident) will follow
you. All that trouble, just for taking a pain pill from
your spouses prescription for a back pain!
One more thing you need to
remember is that it may take up to two weeks. depending
on how much water and other liquids you consume, to
rid your system from that one pain pill. Another bad
thing about this pain pill you took is that your body
is changing it as time goes by from codeine to morphine.
So depending when you get tested the result could come
back as positive for morphine! Since the person that
ordered the test on you knows about drugs about as much
as you do or less, he may be thinking youre a
heroin abuser. Good luck in explaining that finding!
Scenario Two
On the other hand, a casual
weekend marijuana puff or two at a party, and you may
think why not, no harm done; may end up costing you
your job or career. The real problem with marijuana
unlike other drugs, it stores in your fat and it takes
a long time for your system to rid itself of it.
These are two small illustrations
of how careful you have to be when it comes to taking
any drugs, whether prescribed or not. You have a career
to protect. If you are in doubt ask us at ExperTox and
we can help you in evaluating your individual situation.
Drug Testing Facts
The staff at ExperTox feel
its important to inform the workers that taking
oral adulterants or adding adulterations to their urine
specimens does not go undetected. The advanced
technology used today in drug testing can assure positive
detection of almost anything that a person has taken
or added in their urine specimens. Beware, many
companies will not hire or accept anyone who has submitted
an adulterated specimen. In some cases it is grounds
for termination.
Hair testing, on the other
hand, is a very specialized but controversial testing
technique that is gaining acceptance in the industrial
communities. This testing technique, while more
extensive, can test someone for drugs of abuse over
a longer period of time. For example, it is accepted
that there is about an inch of hair growth, in the area
of the nape of the neck, per two months of life. For
some people theres a little more growth, some
a little less. If an individual consumes drugs they
will get deposited through the growing hair follicle
in the hair shaft. These drugs can be detected
through hair testing procedure. Hair samples unlike
urine specimens are not easily adulterated. ExperTox
can provide these specialized hair testing services
for either an individual or company.
It may be stated in conclusion
that there is much confusion about drug testing and
its effectiveness. It is unfortunate that
this knowledge is not being shared effectively, not
with the medical community, not with the courts, not
with the US workforce, and certainly not with the various
drug testing policy makers. If we can do a better job
of educating both workers and industry, then maybe we
can improve the quality of workers and the whole program
of drug testing in the workplace.
|